<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DC Dispatches &#187; news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dcdispatches.com/tag/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dcdispatches.com</link>
	<description>Sic semper something or other.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:15:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NSA reportedly intercepting &#8220;all&#8221; email.</title>
		<link>http://www.dcdispatches.com/2009/02/02/nsa-reportedly-intercepting-all-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dcdispatches.com/2009/02/02/nsa-reportedly-intercepting-all-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Overheard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcdispatches.com/2009/02/02/nsa-reportedly-intercepting-all-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, this is vague second or third or fourth-hand knowledge, but we think it comes from a credible source. We&#8217;ll all know this evening. NBC camera man Jim Long says he&#8217;s shooting an interview with the &#8220;foremost author on [the] NSA.&#8221; We think that means James Bamford, who has a pretty solid track record. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, this is vague second or third or fourth-hand knowledge, but we <em>think</em> it comes from a credible source. We&#8217;ll all know this evening. NBC camera man Jim Long says he&#8217;s shooting an interview with <a href="https://twitter.com/newmediajim/statuses/1169893316">the &#8220;foremost author on [the] NSA.&#8221;</a> We think that means James Bamford, who has a pretty solid track record. In this interview the subject (assumed to be Bamford) says all email is intercepted.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll know if it is Bamford, and presumably more context and details, <a href="https://twitter.com/newmediajim/status/1169645472">tonight</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be curious to see how far the Obama administration&#8217;s transparency schtick sticks when it comes to dealing with these allegations.<br />
<span id="more-40"></span><br />
<strong>Updated:</strong> Long confirmed it is Bamford and has noted that a NOVA documentary, &#8220;<a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/spyfactory/">The Spy Factory</a>&#8220;, that Bamford was involved in is being broadcast on PBS tomorrow (similar in name to Bamford&#8217;s latest book, &#8220;The Shadow Factory&#8221;). We kind of feel like shills here, but while we&#8217;re at it: We&#8217;re waiting for another documentary to become available on Netflix, <a href="http://www.secrecyfilm.com/">Secrecy</a>.</p>
<p>Added on the evening of 15 April 2009: In the <cite>New York Times</cite>, the article &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/16/us/16nsa.html">NSA&#8217;s Intercepts Exceed Limits Set By Congress</a>&#8221; seems to reinforce the hearsay I quoted in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dcdispatches.com/2009/02/02/nsa-reportedly-intercepting-all-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In higher relief</title>
		<link>http://www.dcdispatches.com/2008/07/04/in-higher-relief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dcdispatches.com/2008/07/04/in-higher-relief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Declaration of Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machination.org/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I&#8217;m listening to the reading of the Declaration of Independence on NPR this morning as I read the news.


I am not encouraged as the two hundred and thirty two years old litany of complaints echoes through my head and I compare them to the nature of the recent news an analysis (see the clippings at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
I&#8217;m listening to the reading of the <a href="http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html">Declaration of Independence</a> on NPR this morning as I read the news.
</p>
<p>
I am not encouraged as the two hundred and thirty two years old litany of complaints echoes through my head and I compare them to the nature of the recent news an analysis (see the <a href="http://del.icio.us/mjb/clippings">clippings</a> at the side) relating to the same issues in this country today. From the latest uses of the police and the military and intelligence, to the further co-opting of corporations, to the short-sighted capitulation of politicians who have proclaimed solidarity with the principles of of this document and our <a href="http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html">Constitution</a>, we seem to be going backwards.
</p>
<p>
Washington is so full of contrasts between principles and actions &mdash; that is, hypocrisy &mdash; that one becomes weary rather than more indignant. One feels foolish to get riled up sometimes. The culture encourages the belief that to repeatedly ask for such discrepancies &mdash; obvious to all who bother to look &mdash; to be reconciled is to be &#8220;biased&#8221; (like everyone else, and therefore hardly worth paying attention to) or merely to pedantic to be relevant.
</p>
<p>
But if today has any meaning at all, then it is to raise such things in even higher relief. Perhaps it is the inherent nature of the State?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dcdispatches.com/2008/07/04/in-higher-relief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
